Best Of
Re: Simple vs Complete Investment Tracking
I vote for simple. PLEASE???????
Please just get the balance and maybe transactions. But in no case should Simplifi be attempting to calculate anything with investment accounts. The brokerage already does that.
I like to track my weekly/monthly contributions to ensure I'm on track. The transactions that show the receiving transaction is nice to have, but those are all ignored anyway.
And stop with the total cost adjustment every single day - nobody is going to do more than twice.
Re: FDP-103 Error still exists with Tangerine
It is extremely frustrating that this issue is STILL unresolved! How hard is it for Simplifi to change login credentials from a PIN to password for its customers. Please make this a HIGH priority for your customers.
Re: Unable to delete Items and Projects in Invoices
@cyberstackn, thanks for posting your feedback to the Community!
I'm also not finding a way to delete an Item or a Project in Quicken Business & Personal. With that, the best way to get your suggestions in front of our product team would be to create QBP-specific Idea posts here in the Community. You'd want to create an individual Idea post for each request (one for the ability to delete Items and one for the ability to delete Projects), and other users will be able to vote for each one.
Here is our FAQ with more details on Idea posts:
I hope this helps!
Re: Unable to delete Items and Projects in Invoices
When using a product like Simplifi — where there are help articles on various topics but no real user manual — it's pretty common to just try things out to see how they work. Unfortunately, that turns into something of a trap as there are a number of things that can't be deleted once created.
For example, your issue is similar to a known problem — namely, you can't delete a Business in QBP. There is a pending request for allowing deletion that is marked "This ability should be available this year!" But so far it is still impossible.
DryHeat
Re: QBP: Option to hide unused categories in the Schedule C, E, F View in Taxes Report (edited)
Added my vote…. While being able to Show those categories may inspire recategorization, hiding them is cleaner for viewing quickly.
RobWilk
Re: QBP: Option to hide unused categories in the Schedule C, E, F View in Taxes Report (edited)
@cyberstackn, thanks for posting your feedback on the Taxes Report to the Community!
I have gone ahead and turned this into an Idea post requesting the ability to hide unused Expense Categories from the Taxes Report so other users can vote on it and our product team can review it. For any additional requests, such as showing Income at the top of the Taxes Report, you will want to create a separate Idea post.
Here is our FAQ on creating and voting for Idea posts here in the Community:
Thanks again for the great suggestion!
Re: How to set up Hospital Bill to show remaining balance (edited)
You can set up a manual account for it and use an Opening Balance transaction to set the balance. Then set up a recurring reminder for the payment transaction, as a transfer from your bank account to this manual account. This way each payment towards the debt should lower the balance of the account, keeping track of the debt remaining.
Re: "You have already added all your accounts" message with Amex
Hello @PGLConsultant,
That is certainly good news! I am glad you were able to get everything connected, and thank you for your diligence!
-Coach Jon
Re: "You have already added all your accounts" message with Amex
@Coach Jon - I got a notification that you had responded. So, on a whim, I decided to try one more time to connect ALL my accounts through the Simplifi app. I hope I don't jinx myself but it literally just found ALL 6 ACCOUNTS and they have been updated/added successfully! I say this with great trepidation because I've been known to get excited about something tech related only to have it prove me wrong later.
But, for now, it appears that all of my accounts are actually linked and operating correctly. It was definitely an exercise to provide all of this information to you but I'm glad I went through it. Hopefully, this will correct the problem for everyone else on this thread who has had an issue. Thanks for your help!
Re: Advanced Transaction Rules: Share your feedback here!
Today was the first day I've logged in with the new feature enabled and I wanted to give it a try. I haven't seen one in action yet, but I did notice that the create rule screen was inconsistently defaulting some of the checkboxes. Here's what I believe I did in this order:
- Clicked +Rule from the Rules settings page to preview what the new options looked like
- Clicked the Exclude From box to view those expanded options
- Cancelled out of the new rule setup menu
- Chose Edit on an existing rule
- The Exclude From box I'd checked in the previous window before cancelling defaulted to checked like instead of defaulting to unchecked/collapsed. I expected this to be collapsed initially when opening an existing rule.
- Added a tag rule to the existing rule
- The Apply to past transactions was unchecked (as desired)
- Created rule
- Edited another existing rule
- Same experience as above up until the Apply to past transactions screen
- This time the Apply to past transactions box was defaulted to checked (NOT desired)
- I cancelled the change for now and will revisit it at a later time
While the Exclude from defaulting as checked was unexpected, there is no unexpected risk. But it seems like the apply to past transactions should default to unchecked and do so consistently to ensure users do not unintentionally change past transactions.
On a related note, I think it would be helpful to know exactly how many transactions (and ideally which transactions) are going to be updated if you select to apply to past transactions. From what I can tell, the preview window only shows you the last handful of matching transactions, which could be misleading or cause user oversight if recent behaviors/usage was different than past behaviors/usage. This could be similar to how you get another confirmation pop up when deleting a category or tag. Without the ability to search or view the original statement descriptions anywhere else in the system, you literally have to use the sample transactions provided and your own memory to decide the best option for each rule creation/change.
Thanks for continuing to improve the system and request user feedback on changes!



