Here is my honest opinion of QS.
I have been using QC (Quicken Classic) for 20+ years. I travel extensively, 80% of my time, QC sync was just not reliable or I found useable. QC served my needs while not traveling.
I sought alternatives. QS (Quicken Simplifi) and a competitor. I will not comment here on the competitor.
These are my opinions. Would I recommend QS? Sure, for entry level user or those not detailed “into the weeds”. That’s who it is really built for.
PROs
- Interface is clean and simple.
- No issues with checking, saving, credit cards, assets. Sync often, works. Like the "pending" transactions.
- Dashboard is simple and provides basic information for most users.
- Some reports are great.
- Watchlist. I do like this feature. Only enhancement would be to allow the end user select between “Projected” or “Remaining”. I would rather see “remaining” projection is pixie dust or show both.
- Asset tracking is the same as QC. Which is a nice touch.
- Savings goal. Works.
CONS: Investment
- Way to basic. Needs at least some more control. Just way to limited very limited.
- You can’t export data is beyond me to dump into a Pivot table / PowerBi. Data Prison?
- Can’t even run a basic report like “Income Interest/Dividend”. This is a must. Yes. You can modify “Action” as workaround, but for me, I have to many accounts to do transactions one by one since QS will not let you modify multi-transactions at once for “Action”. Also “Actions” are prebaked. I have not added all my accounts at this time just for this reason.
- Portfolio is always asking for input by me on some money market or cash to update cost basis. Why? This is what QS should be doing so I can track income for interest/divided and stocks, ETF, CEF, Mutual, etc. performance.
- Reports. Well. There is none. The portfolio, balance, and performance not considered reports they are dashboard information (my opinion). Need to be able to print out the graphs, can't find a way to do that. Reporting area needs to be major focus.
Other:
- Cash Flow. Not very useful to me. One area QS should consider re-thinking.
- Spending Plan. Still playing around with this area. I don’t use “bills”, etc.. I much prefer the QC budget tool over QS. The layout and interface should be more like QC. My opinion, the input interface is not user-friendly. To many “clicks” to create and update.
- “Coming Soon” Please define “Coming Soon” 1 month? 1 year? 5 years?
- Transfer. Works good in identifying matching 95% of the time.
Overall, as I mentioned. QS is more for entry level or those that don’t get into the weeds.
Will I keep using QS? Not sure yet. I will see what improvements are made in 2026 and re-evaluate. Right now, QC is still my go to. I can’t continue maintaining QC and QS in parallel. I will need to make a find determine by end of 2026. I will provide update as enhancement rollout depending on definition of "coming soon"