I vote for having the option to bring downloaded transactions in as Uncategorized.
Same vote for me.
I have rules to categorize amazon, walmart… as Shopping, which I use as a placeholder until I modify the category to be more specific. I also mark transactions as Reviewed when they have the correct category, and every day or so I filter by Not Reviewed and see what needs to be modified.
I vote for this as well. My experience with auto-categorization has been poor.
I see no evidence that it "learns" when I correct transactions. I have been correcting fuel purchases from BP that auto-categorize as "clothing" since I signed up. I finally set up a rule that will hopefully fix this, but I had hoped that this is something that it would correct on its own. Also, every check transaction (yes, people still use checks) imported from my bank shows the payee as "Check #nnnn" (where nnnn is the check number) which makes payee rules impossible because there seems to be no way to use wild-cards in the payee field. The auto-categorization sets every "Check" transaction as a mortgage payment. Once again, there seems to be no way to teach it otherwise. In my experience, Mint, which I used before, was bad at categorizing transactions, but it was free, so that was tolerable. I'm going to hold a paid product to higher standards.
A feature I enjoy on YNAB is new transactions are <b>bold</b> allowing easy ident of new transactions needing review. Personally I don't want to have to enable another column to include the <i>reviewed</i> flag. Admittedly I haven't tried it yet, but it doesn't sound appealing to me.
I've been using the Reviewed column for a couple of years and like it a lot. It takes up very little space, just the width of a checkmark. If you haven't tried it yet, I'd recommend trying it just to see, maybe you will like it!
I feel like the Reviewed status should just behave more like the Exclude From Spending Plan/Reports icons. That's how it works on mobile and it barely takes up any space, plus has the advantage of showing up in the spending plan and other views as well.
The fact that it's basically hidden on web but shows up everywhere and can't be disabled on mobile seems a bit odd.
At a minimum, it would be helpful to quickly know when looking at the list of transactions whether the Categorization was set by Me, a Rule I created, or Simplifi's "Ai"
I vote to also have transactions NOT automatically categorized. I can create my own rules and modify once a week or month. Most of my transactions already have a rule in place. Automatically categorizing a transactions may cause me to miss something. I would rather it show as 'needs reviewed' or 'uncategorized' so it will draw my attention to it.
There's no reason this wouldn't be a simple on/off option…unless Quicken benefits from having us all use it: some kind of AI training perhaps, or the harvesting/sale of data?
Add my vote for this feature, only rather than a blank category, it should be set to the 'Uncategorized' category, which is a native category (not custom). Further, it should be an OPTION to enable/disable automatic category assignments for unknown payees (ones that do not have a rule already assigned). I have to agree with others above that the automatic assignments in Simplifi are horribly unreliable if not comical, like many crowd sourced databases. A far better algorithm would be something like Google Maps does, where data are crowd sourced but verified by system admins or other humans qualified to vet the data.