Rule Enhancements

Strigolactone
Strigolactone Member
edited January 31 in Feedback

A bit of finesse is still needed with rules, I recently worked on a bunch of transactions.

  1. The transaction is for utilities, and needs to be split for trash, sewer, and water. That function doesn't exist, and you can only designate one category in series creation.
  2. Secondly- I noticed an unrelated issue, which is present even using original statement names.

    I want all transfers TO and FROM accounts designated as such, and I significantly dislike the "linked transactions". Transfers that are positive (credit) are named Transfer TO Acct ####, and Transfer that are negative (debit) are Transfers FROM Acct ####.

    For example:

    The rule states, Rename payee to "Transfer to Checking (1234)" if the original statement name has the EXACT name "transfer to cashback debit 1234"; set category to Transfer. This should only work on positive transactions.

    A second rule states, Rename payee to "Transfer From Checking (1234)" if the original statement name has the EXACT name "transfer from cashback debit 1234"; set category to Transfer. This should only work on negative transactions.

    I watched before my very eyes as each rule would impact both, disregarding the exact "to" and "for" explicitly required by the rules.

    Here's a screenshot of the rules. I didn't get a screengrab of the previous transactions auto updated back and forth.

I may "fix" this by just changing it to read, Transfer: Checking (1234) but this is quite annoying after spending a few hours doing it manually and then redoing it after the rules messed it up.

Comments

This discussion has been closed.